gentoo-ebuilds/dev-scheme/guile-lib/files/guile-lib-0.2.8.1-guile3-primes.patch
Sam James a4cda180db
dev-scheme/guile-lib: add 0.2.8.1
This includes Zack Weinberg's patch to fix tests w/ guile-3.0, which
I've only applied for 3.0.

But in the course of spending a while to get the ebuild working with
two impls and only patching one, I found that 2-2 was clearly not cared
for upstream anymore as I hit two different issues and one of them
had an unreplied-to patch on the ML, so I gave up. Just declare compat
w/ 3-0 and worry about older later for this version on the offchance
someone requests it.

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/877785
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/941404
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
2024-12-29 10:51:36 +00:00

26 lines
1.1 KiB
Diff

# Note that this patch requires >=guile-3, so we apply it conditionally.
# https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2024-05/msg00012.html
#
# Fix compile and test failures due to bitvector API change.
# https://bugs.gentoo.org/877785
--- a/src/math/primes.scm 2024-05-23 19:26:16.757865343 -0400
+++ b/src/math/primes.scm 2024-05-23 19:28:20.797358650 -0400
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
(set! prime:prime-sqr (* nexp nexp))
(set! prime:sieve (make-bitvector nexp #f))
(for-each (lambda (prime)
- (bitvector-set! prime:sieve prime #t))
+ (bitvector-set-bit! prime:sieve prime))
primes)
(set! prime:products (reverse (cons comp comps))))
(else
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
There is a slight chance, @code{(expt 2 (- prime:trials))}, that a
composite will return @code{#t}."
(set! n (abs n))
- (cond ((< n (bitvector-length prime:sieve)) (bitvector-ref prime:sieve n))
+ (cond ((< n (bitvector-length prime:sieve)) (bitvector-bit-set? prime:sieve n))
((even? n) #f)
((primes-gcd? n prime:products) #f)
((< n prime:prime-sqr) #t)